CHANDERKANT ARORA AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA TH. SECY. DEPTT. OF DEFENCE AND ORS
MA/172/2018 · 2025-08-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5503 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5503 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: MA No.172/2018
Chanderkant Arora and another
..... Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
Vs
Union of India and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Parkhi Parihar, Assisting Counsel to Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.08.2025
The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the appellants on the last two consecutive dates of hearing i.e. 04.09.2018 and 02.12.2019 and same is the position even today. It appears that the appellants have lost interest in prosecuting the instant appeal which is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s).
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 07.08.2025 Shammi Sr. No. 06 SHAMMI KUMAR 2025.08.07 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document