Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010612372025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31962/2025 Between:
1. BALA NAIDU AKKANA, S/O. LATE AKKANA GURAVAIATI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, R/O. H.NO. 6-325, NTR COLONY, VENKATAGIRI TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), STATE SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANAGALGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (PRESENT), ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTHI RURAL P.S., TIRUPATI DISTRICT (PRESENT), ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents particularly respondent nos. 3 and 4 in not taking cognizance and register my complaint- report lodged and the representations, dated 24.09.2025 and 10.10.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents particularly respondents 3 and 4 to take cognizance of the complaint- report lodged by me and the representation dated 24.09.2025 and 10.10.2025 and to register an F.I.R. against Aalam Hari Krishna, S/o. Late A Dora Swamy and Rayapaneni Mallikarjuna Naidu (father name not known) and further investigate into the matter in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. THANJAVURU VENKATA SUMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents particularly respondent nos. 3 and 4 in not taking cognizance and register my complaint- report lodged and the representations, dated 24.09.2025 and 10.10.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents particularly respondents 3 and 4 to take cognizance of the complaint- report lodged by me and the representation dated 24.09.2025 and 10.10.2025 and to register an F.I.R. against Aalam Hari Krishna, S/o.Late A Dora Swamy and Rayapaneni Mallikarjuna Naidu (father name not known) and further investigate into the matter in the interest of justice and pass ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that basing on the very same set of facts, petitioner’s mother gave a complaint, which is registered as a case in Crime No.200 of 2025 of Srikalahasti Rural Police Station, Tirupati District, for the same set of facts, petitioner also gave another complaint, for that reason, respondent Police did not register a case, and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
3
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* dinesh
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 31962 of 2025
28.11.2025
Mjl /*