1 2025:CGHC:17182 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4594 of 2017 • Ankit Sharma S/o Ramesh Sharma, Aged About 28 Years R/o Baikunthpur, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3. Karan Lal Kannojiya S/o Thaneshwar Prasad Kannojiya OBC, Presently Posted As Peon/ Wardboy, Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4. Ravi Prasad S/o Visheshwar Prasad Sahu, Presently Posted As Peon/wardboy, Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5. Suresh Shrivas S/o Ramayan Prasad Shrivas, Presently Posted As Peon/wardboy, Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 For Respondent No. 3 For Respondents No. 4 & 5 : : : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer Ms. Anushka Sharma, holding the brief of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate Mr. Roop Naik, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 15/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the petitioner's case. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the appointment of respondent no. 3 to 5 being illegal and direct the respondent no. 2 to advertise the posts afresh and start selection process according to provisions of law. 10.3 Thay any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper together with cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there was illegal and stringent condition in the Advertisement that the candidates should have live registration in the Employment Office, Raigarh and such condition is violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents would submit that Condition No. 03 mentioned in Advertisement was modified by the Chief Medical and Health Officer vide Notification dated 04.06.2016 and instead of Raigarh, State of Chhattisgarh was substituted. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that Condition No. 03 of the Advertisement was modified by the Chief Medical and Health Officer on 04.06.2016, no direction or order can be passed in favour of the petitioner, therefore, this petition fails and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti