Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55019 (PNJ)

SHYAM SUNDER BANSAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/25674/2025 · 2025-05-12

Sanjiv Berry

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-25674-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25674-2025 Date of decision: 12.05.2025 SHYAM SUNDER BANSAL ….PETITIONER(S) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J.(ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for directions to respondents No. 2 to get investigated the entire matter thoroughly and impartially, pertaining to the FIR No.242 dated 29.10.2024 under Sections 420, 406 of IPC, P.S. Ambala Sadar, Ambala, Haryana (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the alleged FIR (Annexure P-1) having been lodged by the petitioner, being the complainant therein, on account of huge fraud being committed by naming the accused specifically, but no action thereon has been taken by the police. Thereafter, the petitioner had moved the representation dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) to the Superintendent of Police, Ambala, Haryana, but till date no action thereon has been taken. He further submits that for the purpose of the petition, the petitioner will be satisfied if KANIKA 2025.05.16 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-25674-2025 2 appropriate directions are given to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) in accordance with law in an expeditious manner. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Praveen Bhadu, AAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State- respondents No. 1and 2 and submits that the aforesaid representation will be disposed of in an expeditious manner in accordance with law. 5. After considering the rival contentions and considering the limited request made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Ambala, Haryana, to consider and dispose of the representation dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) in accordance with law in an expeditious manner. 6. The decision so taken be intimated to the petitioner. 7. Disposed of. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 12.05.2025 kanika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.05.16 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment