Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55019 (AP)

Vadlamudi Sivaramakrishna v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/10231/2019 · 2025-11-20

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010231912019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10231/2019 Between: 1. VADLAMUDI SIVARAMAKRISHNA, S/O. BRAHMANANDAM, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.16- 391/C, PIDUGURALLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503, 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PIDUGURALLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PIDUGURALLA POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. DACHINENI VENKAIAH, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. MILITARY SCHOOL STREET, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to memorandum of representation petition, a copy of which is annexed hereto, together with the decision therein 2 should be called for and pursued IT IS HEREBY COMMANDED. 1)That you, the aforesaid Respondent No.do sent, of our use in High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh all and singular the said record and other with all the things touching the same as fully and perfectly as they have been made by you and now remain in your custody or power together with this, Rule before the day of2019 and that you intend to oppose the petition you the aforesaid Respondent No.do appear personally OR by Advocate on the day of2018 at 10-30 A.M. before the court show cause why this petition should not be complied with and that we may cause further to be done there on what of right and according to law we shall see fit to be done. WITNESS the Hon'ble Chief Justice of High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 not to initiate any criminal proceedings at the instance of 5th respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.10231 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri Sudhakar Rao Ambati, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 21.11.2025 SSA/RMR 4 78 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:10231 OF 2019 Date: 21.11.2025 SSA/RMR