APHC010440292021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 26723/2021 Between: 1. D.SUGUNAMMA, W/O.D.NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED 36 YEARS,R/O 3-165, BC COLONY, OBULADEVARA CHERUVU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPUR. 2. D.RAMANJANEYULU, S/O.D.NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED 22 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER, R/O.3-165, BC COLONY, OBULADEVARA CHERUVU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPUR. 3. D.ASHOK KUMAR, S/O.D.NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED 20 YEARS, R/O 3-165, BC COLONY, OBULADEVARA CHERUVU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPUR. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, OBULADEVARA CHERUVU POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. E SURENDRA, S/O RAMCHANDRA, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O BC COLONY, OBULADEVARA CHERUVU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent calling to the police station in their non related civil dispute of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of the natural justice and consequently, direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station with regard to the civil dispute and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioners seeking the following relief: “... to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent calling to the police station in their non related civil dispute of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of the natural justice and consequently, direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station and pass ....” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court on 16.11.2021, respondent Police are not calling the Petitioners to the Police Station and never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and would finally submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submissions, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 26723 of 2021 14.10.2025 Mjl /*