Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55011 (AP)

GALI SANYASI RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/29879/2025 · 2025-11-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010552722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29879/2025 Between: 1. GALI SANYASI RAO, S/O. GALI DEMUDU, AGED-67 YRS, R/O- 65-6- 583, HIMACHAL NAGAR GAJUWAKA,VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH, 530026. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHODAVARAM POLICE STATION, VENKANNAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH, 531036. 4. CHALLA YERUKU NAIDU, S/O. LATE RAMU NAIDU, R/O. RAIVADA VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL, ANKAPALLE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARUMANCHI DHEERAJ REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring action of the 3rd Respondent in repeatedly calling the Petitioner to the police station, interfering in a purely civil dispute, as illegal, arbitrary, one without jurisdiction and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes by calling the Petitioner to the police station.” 2 2. Heard Sri K.Dheeraj Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties unless there is a specific direction from the Hon’ble Court. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 05.11.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29879 of 2025 Dt..05.11.2025 ASR