Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5501 (ORI)

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., WORKS DEPTT., ODISHA v. NIRANJAN BAHINIPATI

WA/1039/2025 · 2026-03-09

Chittaranjan Dash, Dixit K S

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.A. No.1244 of 2025 Principal Secretary to Government, Works Department, Govt. of Odisha, Bhubaneswar and others …. Appellants Mr. S.B. Panda, AGA -Versus- Hema Chandra Pattnaik and another …. Respondents Mr. M.K. Mishra, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Tanmay Mishra, Advocate (Caveator) CORAM: JUSTICE KRISHNA SHRIPAD DIXIT JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. 01. ORDER 09.03.2026 W.A. No.1244 of 2025 and I.A. No.3194 of 2025, W.A. No.1039 of 2025 and I.A. No.2996 of 2025, W.A. No.1065 of 2025 and I.A. No.2549 of 2025, W.A. No.1537 of 2025 and I.A. No.3468 of 2025, W.A. No.1711 of 2025 and I.A. No.4189 of 2025, W.A. No.1855 of 2025 and I.A. No.4535 of 2025 and W.A. No.1932 of 2025 and I.A. No.4755 of 2025 In all these matters, learned AGA having argued the matter at length, now very fairly submits that order of the learned Single Judge would be given effect to, inasmuch as it has only directed consideration of the case in the light of order dated 03.02.2021 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.38771 of 2020 between Pradip Kumar Panigrahi v. State of Odisha. We are told at the Bar that this decision on being p. 2 challenged before the Apex Court, has been affirmed and thus has attained finality in SLP (C) Diary No(s).50364 of 2023 disposed off on 02.01.2024. 2. Furthermore, these Intra-Court appeals are moved by the State after brooking a varying delay. Although applications supported by affidavits are filed for condoning the delay, the explanations offered in the applications are not plausible and unaccepted. There cannot be different yardstick for the State and its Officials when it comes to the limitation period, of course with all just exceptions. Therefore, the applications are thoroughly unworthy of lenient consideration. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in these appeals and accordingly they are disposed off, costs having been made easy. The orders of the learned Single Judge shall be implemented within an outer limit of eight weeks. It is open to the decision-maker to solicit any information/documents from the side of employees, however subject to the rider that in that guise, delay shall not be brooked. Web copy of order to be acted upon by all concerned. (Krishna Shripad Dixit) Judge ( Chittaranjan Dash ) Judge Anisha Designation: Jr. Stenographer