APHC010166962024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8572/2024 Between: 1. MADUGULA KRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE APPA RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O VANDRANGI VILLAGE,PONDURU POST, G.SIGADAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME-DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONDURU POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 4. MADUGULA SURYAKANTHAM, W/O LATE SURIBABU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, PONDURU TOWN/MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 5. REGIDI GAVARA RAJU, S/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCCTEACHER, PONDURU TOWN/MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 6. REGIDI LAKSHMI, W/O GAVARA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, PONDURU TOWN/MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the Respondents no.2 85 3 to Register the FIR/crime against the accused/respondent no. 4 to 6 on petitioner complaint dt 17.03.2024 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct Respondents No.2 and 3 to Register the FIR/crime against the accused on petitioner complaint dt 17.3.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TENE PANDU RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the Respondents 2 & 3 to Register the FIR/crime against the accused/respondents 4 to 6 on petitioner complaint dt.17.03.2024 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Arts. 14, 21 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently, direct Respondents 2 and 3 to Register the FIR/crime against the accused on petitioner complaint dt.17.3.2024 and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that the complaint of the Petitioner is received and the respondent Police gave receipt No.57/2024 dated 18.3.2024 to the petitioner, as per the contents of the complaint, the dispute is purely „civil in nature‟ when, Police did not interfere in the disputes. As per the previous records of the Ponduru Police Station, a case in Crime No.16 of 2020 was registered against respondents 4 to 6 about the same land dispute and requested to dispose of this Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 3 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate Forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 8572 of 2024 22.11.2025 Mjl /* Dinesh