APHC010153232020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 9468/2020 Between: 1. MANNEPALLI SRINIVASULU,, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O H.NO. 2-35, SCHOOL ROAD, CHANDRASEKHARAPURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, AT ONGOLE. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKURU REVENUE DIVISION, KANDUKURU TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, CHANDRASEKHARAPURAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GADE VENKATESWARA RAO 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 Order: No representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents, particularly the 4th respondent and his personnel, in converting/making the Grazing Lands admeasuring Ac.681-60 cents in S.No.147-1 of Chandrasekharapuram Village and Mandal, Prakasam District, into house sites under the Navaratnalu–Pedalandariki Illu Scheme. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 18.09.2025, submits that the subject land is a grazing poramboke land and it was not used for the above said public purpose, and if so required, the respondent authorities would follow the due procedure. 4. The copy of instructions of the 4th respondent shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim orders, if any, stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 18.09.2025 PNS