Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5500 (RAJ)

RAMJAN KHAN S/O BHURE KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SAW/72/2025 · 2025-02-04

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4778-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 72/2025 Ramjan Khan S/o Bhure Khan, Aged About 74 Years, R/o Bawri Ka Baas, Sanganer, District Jaipur, Presently Running Shop At Main Bazar, Gandhi Katla, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director Local Bodies, Government Of Rajasthan, Having Its Office At G-3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C- Scheme, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur-16 (Rajasthan). 3. Jaipur Municipal Corporation Greater Jaipur, Through Its Commissioner, Having Office At Pandit Dindayal Uppadhyay Bhawan, Lal Kothi Tonk Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Sanganer Zone, Jaipur Municipal Corporation Greater Jaipur Having Its Office At Sanganer Stadium Road, Near Girls School, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena,Adv.with Mr. Lovesh Mamnani, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 04/02/2025 1. The argument of learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is entitled to reasonable opportunity of hearing before eviction as per law cannot be accepted because learned counsel for the appellant has failed to demonstrate as to which provision [2025:RJ-JP:4778-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-72/2025] of the municipal law applicable, has been violated. The appellant having lost in the suit and decree of permanent injunction having not been granted, all that he is entitled to is the notice for eviction and grant of reasonable time to vacate the premises. Therefore, no interference is called for. 2. The instant appeal is accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ N.Gandhi-Chandan/25