APHC010177592009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2137/2009 Between: 1. KINJARAPU DHILLESWARA RAO,, S/O YERRAYYA, R/O SC COLONY, GARA VILLAGE & MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP BY ITS PP HYD TRGH POLICE GARA, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad, through S.I., of Police, Gara. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Crl.R.C., is being preferred assailing the order dated 21-08-2009 in Crl.A.No.58 of 2008 on the file of the District & Sessions Judge, Srikakulam in confirming the Judgment, dated 13-06-2008 in CC.No.236 of 2007 on the file of the J.F.C.M., Spl. Mobile, Srikakulam. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B V APARNA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: SS, J Crl.R.C No.2137 of 2009 2 JUDGMENT: Heard the learned counsel for petitioner Smt. B. V. Aparna Lakshmi who appeared through virtual conference. 2. Prosecution is represented through the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. This Criminal Revision Case is preferred challenging the concurrent finding of sentence passed by the trial Court against the accused, wherein the accused was found guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 304-A and 337 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to pay a total fine of Rs.10,500/- (Rupees ten thousand and five hundreds only), in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for a period of six (6) months. 4. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to pay the fine amount to comply the order of sentence passed by the learned trial court by making payment of fine, subject to necessary time be granted to him. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor raised no objection and submits that the matter may be disposed of. 6. Heaving heard the learned counsel for both the parties and also considering the fact narrated in the instant criminal revision, it appears that awarding of sentence regarding payment of fine by SS, J Crl.R.C No.2137 of 2009 3 the accused person is herein admitted. Thus, nothing left in the Criminal Revision Petition to decide. 7. Accordingly, petitioner is directed to pay the fine amount before the learned Trial Court in terms of the Judgment of sentence dated 13.06.2008 passed in CC.No.236 of 2007 by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court, Srikakulam, within four (4) weeks from the date of passing of this order. Under the above observation, Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. _______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J. Date: 07.11.2025 ARB SS, J Crl.R.C No.2137 of 2009 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Criminal Revision Case No.2137 of 2009 Date: 07.11.2025 ARB