HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No. Crl.P.No.3529 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 05. 03.02.2026 Dr.VJP, J I.A.No.1 of 2026 Sri Kanala Mahesh, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, in the last paragraph of Page No.3 of the Order dated 17.11.2025 in Crl.P.No.3529 of 2023 passed by this Court, it was mistakenly typed as follows: “As can be seen from the material on record, there is no dispute about the relationship between petitioner and respondents 1 to 3. The fact remains that due to disputes the couple are living separately and as per record, decree of divorce was granted by the competent Court of law…….” It is submitted that the divorce petition was dismissed and the petition for restitution of conjugal rights was allowed. Hence, in the place of the abovementioned lines the following lines may be replaced: As can be seen from the material on record, there is no dispute about the relationship between petitioner and respondents 1 to 3. The fact remains that the divorce petition filed by the husband was dismissed vide Order dated 30.10.2023 in H.M.O.P.No.174 of 2016 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu and the petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the wife was allowed vide Order dated 01.06.2017 in O.P.No.48 of 2016 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu……” Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Asst.Public Prosecutor reported ‘no objection’ to rectify the said error. Considering the submissions made, this petition is allowed. Office is directed to rectify the mistake by replacing the lines as mentioned above, in the last paragraph of Page No.3 of the Order dated 17.11.2025 in Crl.P.No.3529 of 2023 passed by this Court and issue fresh copy of the Order. ________ Dr.VJP, J Dinesh