1 2025:CGHC:51799 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7522 of 2025 1 - Kanshiram Raj @ Sarwan S/o Jaidev Singh Aged About 23 Years R/o Sutarra Sukhsagar Para, Thana Katghora, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Police Station- Bankimongra, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. T. R. Patel, Advocate. For Non-applicant(s) : Mr. Karan Kumar Baharani, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 16/10//2025 1. Pursuant to the order dated 18.09.2025, the victim along with her mother appeared through virtual mode from DLSA, Korba and raised objection in granting bail to the applicant, their objection is taken on record. 2. This is first bail application before this Court filed by the applicant for grant of regular bail. The applicant has been arrested on 07.08.2025 in connection with Crime No. 129/2025 registered at Police Station Bankimongra, District Korba (C.G.) for the offence under Sections 75(2), 76, 3(5) of BNS Act and Section 76 (B) of, I.T. Act and Section 8 of POCSO Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that on 02.07.2025, the report has been lodged by the mother of the victim that he was being informed by her sister- in-law that the obscene video of her minor daughter is getting viral in the ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.10.16 19:06:07 +0530 2 mobile phone. She also seen the said obscene video and identified the person and lodged the report. The police has registered the offence under Section 67 (B) of Information Technology Act, 2000 and started investigation. During the investigation statement of the victim was recorded and other offences of Section 75(2), 76,, 3(5) of BNS and Section 8 of POCSO Act, have been added. The applicant has been arrested on 07.08.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence. He has not prepared any obscene video of the victim and has not made it viral in the whatsapp or any other social platform. He would also submits that from the mobile phone of the applicant nothing incriminating could be detected in the cyber report. The appellant is in jail since 07.08.2025, and final adjudication of the case will take its own time, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes and submitted that from the material collected during the investigation and from the mobile phone of the applicant there are sufficient material found by the cyber cell which disclosed the commission of the offence by the applicant, therefore, he is not entitled for bail. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, considering the nature of allegation and the material collected during investigation further considering the statement of the victim as well as other witnesses and further considering that mobile phone of the applicant has been seized from which the obscene video of the victim was detected, I am not inclined to released the applicant on bail, his bail application is rejected. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok