Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010119782019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5363/2019
Between:
1. KAILASH LAKSHMI,, W/O. SHYAM SUNDER, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC DAILY WAGE EARNER, R/O. BALAJINAGAR MAIN ROAD, SARVEPALLI KALAVA KATTA, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SCS. AND STS. POA ACT, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NELLORE VI-TOWN P.S., NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. B RAMESH BABU, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE-1556, NELLORE VI-TOWN POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICTICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus and declare the inaction of the Respondent No.2 and 3 upon the report of the petitioner dated 26-12-2018 as illegal and violation of provisions of the SCs and STs(POA) Act 1989 and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 to ensure the reigstration of FIR against the Respondent No. 6 and
2 others under the Provisions of SCs and STs(POA) Act 1989 upon the report of the Petitioner dated 26-12-2018 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the Respondent No.3 to ensure the registration of F.I.R. against Respondent No.6 and others under the Provisions of SCs and STs (POA) Act 1989 upon the report of the petitioner dated 26-12-2018 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B SESIBUSHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.5363 OF 2019
ORDER:
Sri G. Ratna Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri B. Sesibushan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 1st December, 2025 cbn
4 31 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No: 5363 OF 2019
1st December, 2025 cbn