SMT. S. SULATHA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ORS.
WPA/691/2023 · 2025-04-03
Tapabrata Chakraborty
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54978 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54978 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] ***
WPA/691/2023
Smt S. Sulatha
Vs.
The Deputy Commissioner and others
Mr. Gopala Binnu Kumar
… for the petitioner
Mr. V. D. Sivabalan
…for the respondents With
WPA/668/2023 IA CAN/1/2023
Shri S. Sudeshnan
Vs.
The Secretary, Port Blair Municipal Council and others
Ms. G. Mini
… for the petitioner
Mr. Rakesh Kumar
Mr. Dibesh Dwivedi …for the respondents April 03, 2025 [SR] Item nos.18&19 Records reveal that both the writ petitions were taken up for consideration by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 17th February, 2025 and the respective parties were directed to exchange their affidavits in both the writ petitions. Today, in course of hearing, on the prayer of Mr. Kumar, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner in WPA/691/2023, the said writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. List the other writ petition being WPA/668/2023 for further consideration on 9th April, 2025. I have been informed by the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties in WPA/668/2023 that the affidavits
have been exchanged by the petitioner and the private respondent. Mr. V. D. Sivabalan, learned advocate appearing for the respondent nos.1 and 2 files the affidavit-in-opposition. Let the same be kept on record and a copy of the same would be handed over to Ms. Mini, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner in WPA/668/2023 in course of the day. The petitioner, accordingly, would be at liberty to file the affidavit-in-reply in the meantime.
( Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. )