Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010004322013 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./62/2013 MD. MANIK CHOUDHURY S/O TARPON CHOUDHURY PERMANENT RESIDENT OF KHATKHATI NEAR RAJ PALACE, P.O. and P.S. KHATKHATI DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM. VERSUS ABDUL KAYUM TALUKDAR S/O MD. I. TALUKDAR, R/O KHATKHATI NEAR M.R.F. TYRE, P.O. and P.S. KHATKHATI DIST.KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A TEWARI, MS.G BARUAH Advocate for the Respondent : DR.B AHMED, MR.H K GOGOI,MR.S ROY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 01.05.2025 The learned counsel Mr. N Poddar submits that the respondent Abdul Kayum Talukdar had already expired. It has been submitted that he was the first party in the trial court. If the legal heirs of Late Abdul Kayum Talukdar are impleaded before the trial court, then only his legal heirs will be required to be impleaded in the present case. 2. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. Page No.# 2/2 3. At this stage, the present criminal revision petition has become infructuous. Therefore, it stands closed and disposed of on becoming infructuous. 4. If the legal representatives of Late Abdul Kayum Talukdar are impleaded before the trial court, then the present petitioner shall have the liberty to approach this Court again. The interim order passed earlier shall stand vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant