IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI ^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23827 OF 2023 Between: Bhathala Project LLP, Rep. by it's Designated Partner, B. Giri Babu Venkataswami, Aged about 54 years, D.No. 13-6-771/20, 0pp. R.T.C. Bus stand Tirupati, Chittoor District. S/o Late B ...Petitioner AND 1. The AP State Power Distribution Company Ltd, (A.P.S.P.D.C.L.) , Rep by ifs CMD, Chief Managing Director, A.P.S.P.D.C.L. Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2. The Superintendent Engineer, (APSPDCL), Tiruchanoor Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh State Power Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3. The Divisional Engineer, Andhra Pradesh State Power Distribution Ltd., Tirupati, Chittoor District. Office, Tiruchnoor Road Road, Tirupati , Distribution Company Ltd., Company 4. M.Venkatramuni Reddy, S/o Late M.Radha Krishna Reddy, Nagar, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Tirupati District. R/o D.No.503, SKD 5. M. Venkataramana Reddy, S/o Late M. Radha Krishna SKD Nagar,Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 6. M. Venkatasubba Reddy, S/o Late M. r SKD Nagar,Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Tirupati District. RR 4 to 6 are impleaded Reddy, R/o D.No.630 Radha Krishna Reddy, R/o D.No.530, per Order of this Court dt.20.09.2023 vide order as passed in I.A.No.2 of 2023. ...Respondents 4* Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent authorities their personnel in not releasing the Electricity supply in favour of the petitioner in respect of extent of land i.e. Ac. 1.66 cents in Sy.No.92/2 of Daminedu Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District is arbitrary, illegal, violation of PrincipJes of Natural Justice, besides violation and provisions of Electricity Act, 2003 and Rules thereon and consequently direct the Respondents to release the Electricity supply in favour of the petitioner in respect of extent of land i.e. Ac. 1.66 cents in Sy.No.92/2 of Daminedu Viliage,Tirupati Rurai Mandal, Tirupati District. lA NO: 1 OF 20?.^ Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be the Electricity supply in favour of the petitioner in respect of extent of land i.e. Ac.1.66 cents in Sy.No.92/2 of Daminedu Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District. Counsel for the Petitioner pleased to direct the Respondent authorities to release : SRI. O UDAYA KUMAR Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, Standing Counsel Counsel for the Respondents : The Court made the following: APHC010459482023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] Ms THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23827/2023 Between: Bhathala Project Lip ...PETITIONER AND The Ap State Power Distribution Company Ltd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.0 UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1. V R REDDY KOWURI(SC FOR APSPDCL) 2. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL 3.VMR LEGAL 4. The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: In pursuance of the Memo filed vide U.S.R.No.47806 of 2025, dated 29.04.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. ^ I Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT.REGISTRAR S^GWSfToFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. OneCCto SRI. O UDAYA KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, Standing Counsel 3. Three CD Copies [OPUC] • \ HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.23827 of 2023 ^18 AUG 2025 j JsCimntSecSgi^ "■'^SSfiAlSSSS^ o\ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS AS WITHDRAWN