IN T 106-I Manpreet K Aninidita Mi School Edu CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated this Court in State of Pun direction “… taking note this Court h just, fair an offered to th to say, if th reasons and personal hea order had be COCP-5839-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5839 of Date of decision : reet Kaushal and others Versus idita Mitra, IAS, Secretary to Govt. l Education, Punjab Civil Secretariat, AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Parminder Paul Sharma, Ad for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG P I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 21.4.2025 (Annexure P-2) passe ourt in CWP-10666-2025 titled as “Man of Punjab and others”, whereby the pet “…to the respondents to decide the note of the aforesaid judgment, within t has no reason to believe the autho ir and reasonable manner. Upon doin to them and if found entitled, grant th if the orders are adverse to their int s and the petitioners shall be free to see Learned counsel for the petiti nal hearing was granted to the petitioner had been passed. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 839 of 2025 (O & M) sion :-16.02.2026 …..Petitioners Govt. of Punjab, Department of tariat, Chandigarh and another …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA a, Advocate AAG Punjab. has been filed alleging violation of passed by a co-ordinate Bench of s “Manpreet Kaushal and others vs. he petition was disposed of with a the legal notice dated 12.3.2025, ithin a period of 6 months, which uthorities would not address in a doing so, after notice and hearing nt the benefit forthwith. Needless r interest, the same shall contain o seek legal redress thereupon.” petitioners submits that although itioners on 12.02.2026, no speaking VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.17 09.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document instructions that a spea affording pe the said spe taken on rec petitioners. speaking or accepted an dates of th petitioners w the directio duly compli present cont February 1 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-5839-2025 (O & M) Per contra, learned counsel ctions from Shri Dinesh Kumar, Senior speaking order dated 12.02.2026 has ing personal hearing to the petitioners id speaking order dated 12.02.2026 is ha on record. Copy thereof has been suppl oners. Learned State counsel further ing order dated 12.02.2026, the claims o ted and the admissible benefits shall be of their respective appointments an oners within a period of three months fro In view of the aforesaid positio irections contained in the Writ Court o complied with and no further orders are nt contempt petition. Accordingly, the present contem Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh 16, 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No Reportable Yes / No 2 unsel for the respondents, on enior Assistant, DSE (SE), submits 6 has, in fact, been passed after ers on the same date. A copy of 6 is handed over in Court, which is supplied to learned counsel for the urther submits that vide the said aims of all the petitioners have been hall be accorded to them from the ts and shall be released to the s from today. osition, this Court is satisfied that ourt order dated 21.04.2025 stand ers are required to be passed in the ontempt petition is disposed of. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.17 09.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document