Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5496 (GUJ)

NADIRHUSEN AHEMADBHAI KURESHI v. STATE OF GUJARAT

SCR.A/11442/2025 · 2025-08-19

Hasmukh D Suthar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/SCR.A/11442/2025 ORDER DATED: 19/08/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION - TO LODGE FIR/COMPLAINT) NO. 11442 of 2025 ========================================================== NADIRHUSEN AHEMADBHAI KURESHI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ========================================================== Appearance: MR AM PAREKH(562) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 19/08/2025 ORAL ORDER 1. By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought for the direction to the respondent authority to register an FIR pursuant to the applications dated 30.11.2022 and 15.05.2025 made by the petitioner. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has vehemently submitted before the respondent authorities but no cognizance is taken and hence, the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court. He has submitted that the petitioner has already made applications dated 30.11.2022 and 15.05.2025 with regard to the registration of the FIR, but nothing has been done. 3. The Hon’ble Superme Court in the case of Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe vs. Hemant Yashwant Dhage & Others reported in (2016)6 SCC 277 observed that if the High Courts entertain such writ petitions seeking registration of FIR, then they will be flooded with such writ petitions and will not be able to do any other work, except dealing with them. 4. The respondent authority is directed to look into the matter and the R/SCR.A/11442/2025 ORDER DATED: 19/08/2025 respondent authority is directed to communicate the outcome of the same to the petitioner. If the petitioner is aggrieved with the said outcome then the petitioner shall have the liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law which shall be decided on its own merits independently by the authority. 5. With above direction, petition is disposed of. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter. Direct service is permitted. (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.) Ajay Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: AJAY CHANDRAN MENON(HC00939), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 19/08/2025 18:08:36