Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54950 (KAR)

SMT VEDAVATHI RAI v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/54569/2017 · 2025-08-04

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29961 WP No. 54569 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 54569 OF 2017 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VEDAVATHI RAI AGED 78 YEARS W/O LATE K. SUNDAR RAI 2. SRI SANTHOSH KUMAR RAI AGED 54 YEARS S/O LATE K. SUNDAR RAI 3. MR ULLAS RAI AGED 49 YEARS S/O LATE K. SUNDAR RAI ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHANDNI OPPOSITE PULANDAYA DAIVA GUDI BIJAI CHURCH ROAD MANGALURU-575 004 DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JAGADISH BALIGA N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER THE MANGALURU CITY CORPORATION LALBAGH, MANGALURU-575 003 DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT. 2. SRI. B. NAGARAJA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE K. SANJEEVA SHETTY Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29961 WP No. 54569 of 2017 3. SRI. B. NITHYANANDA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE K. SANJEEVA SHETTY 4. SMT. LALITHA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O LATE K. SANJEEVA SHETTY 5. SMT. BHAVANI P. SHETTY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS D/O LATE K. SANJEEVA SHETTY 6. SMT. UMAVATHI SHETTY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O LATE K. SANJEEVA SHETTY 7. SMT. KUMARI S. RAI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O LATE K. SANJEEVA SHETTY 8. SMT. SHALINI HEGDE AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS D/O LATE K. SANJEEVA SHETTY RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 8 ARE R/AT "SHREE RAM", BIJAI CHURCH ROAD MANGLAURU-575 004 DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K V NARASIMHAN.,ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. PRASANNA V.R., ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. SHARADI S.SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R4, R6 TO R8; R3 & R5 ARE SERVED) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-A THE ORDER DATED 31.03.2017 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAKSHINA KANNADA, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29961 WP No. 54569 of 2017 MANGALURU IN MISC.APPEAL NO.4/2006 AND CONSEQUENTLY TO QUASH ANNEXURE-B THE ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 321(3) OF THE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT, 1976 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 IN NO.E4/CR 398/2298/2004-05 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 04.08.2025 with a prayer to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. The memo is taken on record. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 96