TEHRI HYDRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. v. MUNI RAM
SPA/774/2017 · 2025-04-25
Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5495 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5495 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:3086-DB
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
SPA No. 774 of 2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Shobhit Saharia,
learned counsel for appellant.
2. Mr. Vipul Painuli, learned A.G.A. for State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for appellant submits that, pursuant to the direction issued in the impugned judgment, the Grievance Redressal Cell has passed an order on 02.04.2018 in favour of respondents/ writ petitioners, which has been put to challenge by Tehri Hydro Development Corporation in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 734 of 2022. He, thus, submits that, since the direction issued in the Writ Petition has been carried out, and the consequential
order passed by the Grievance Redressal Cell has been challenged in a separate Writ Petition, therefore, the cause of action to maintain this Special Appeal does not survive.
4. Mr. Vipul Paniuli, learned counsel appearing for the respondents also submits that the Special Appeal has become infructuous.
5. In view of consensus given by the parties, the Special Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
25.04.2025 Shiksha
SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b 09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9 BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2025.04.28 10:31:38 +05'30'