1 APHC010608322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 31348/2025 Between: 1. RANDHI YASHODHA, W/O. KAMI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS OCC HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O. D. NO.12-159/2, GANESH NAGAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTTIORITY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MADHURAWADA, ZONE -II, VISAKHAPATNAM DISFRICT 4. THE ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER, ZONE -LL. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 5. GOLLAPALLI RANDHI KRISHNAVENI, W/O. KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 48-19-5A, KUCHIPUDI HOMES, SRIRAMACHANDRA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT 2 6. GOLLAPALLI KRISHNA PRASAD, S/O. SIVA RAMA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 48-19-5A, KUCHIPUDI HOMES, SRIRAMACHANDRA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus (i) Declaring the action of Respondent No.4 in issuing the Notice No.01/WS-68/Ward-05/ACP-II/2025 dated 06.11.2025 without giving reasonable opportunity of being heard under Section 636 of Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations,1955 as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and in violation of principles of Natural Justice (ii) Directing the Respondents to pass the appropriate reasoned order in Notice No.01/WS-68/Ward-05/ACP-II/2025 after considering reply dated 10.11.2025 and the reply Dated 30.10.2024 in provisional Notice No. 11086/GVMC/UC/2024 dated 17-09-2024 passed by the 3rd respondent and confirmation Notice No. /Z2/WS-68/WARD- 05/ACP-ll/UC/2024 dated 21-10- 2024, before taking any coercive steps in pursuant to Notice no.01/ws- 68/ward 05/ACP-II/2025 issued under section 636 of A.P.Municipal Corporation Act,1955 (iii) Consequently, Directing Respondent No.4 to revoke the Notice No.01/WS-68/Ward-05/ACP-II/2025 under Section 636 of Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations,1955 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Direct the Respondents, Not to demolish or dispossess the petitioner from his property bearing Door 12-159/2,Ganesh Nagar, Madhurawda, Visakhaf^tnam Pending the disjKJsal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PARAVADA MANOJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHIRANJEEVI TALASILA 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3 APHC010400232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21626/2025 Between: 1. GOLLAPALLI KRISHNA PRASAD,, S/O. SIVARAM PRASAD, AGED 54 YEARS. TEMPORARILY RESIDING AT D.N0.48-19-5A, KUCHIPUDI HOMES, SRIRAMACHANDRA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 2. GOLLAPALLI KRISHNAVENI ALIAS RANDHI KRISHNAVENI,, W/O. KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED 48 YEARS. TEMPORARILY RESIDING AT D.NO.48-19-5A, KUCHIPUDI HOMES,SRIRAMACHANDRA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA,NTR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE GRATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, ZONE-II, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE ASST CITY PLANNER, TOWN PLANNING SECTION, ZONE-II, G.V.M.C, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4 5. RANDHI YASHODA, W/O. KAMINAIDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. 12- 159/2, GANESHNAGAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.-530048 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or direction or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No's 2 to 4 in not proceeding ahead with the confirmation order dt. 21- 10-2024, vide Notice No. Z2/WS-68/WARD-05/ACP-II/UC/2024, as illegal arbitrary and in violation of provisions of A.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and A.P. building Rules, 2017 and consequently direct the respondents No's 2 to 4 to take action against the building constructed by the 5th respondent at D.No. 12-159/2, Ganeshnagar, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam, by considering the endorsement bearing R.C.No. 002173/2025/Zone- II/A/C.P./Gl, dt. 07-01-2025, as per the provisions of the A.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No's 2 to 4 to bring down the construction made by the 5th respondent in contravention of the building permit No. 1086/6154/B/Z2/Maj/2021, dt. 09-12-2021, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHIRANJEEVI TALASILA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. PARAVADA MANOJ KUMAR 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 5 APHC010588422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30404/2025 Between: 1. RANDHI YASHODHA, W/O. KAMI NAIDU OCC. HOUSEHOLD DUTIESAGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O. D. NO.12-159/2, GANESH NAGAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. . ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPRRIENT AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GAJUWAKA, ZONE -VI, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER, ZONE - 11, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. GOLLAPALLI RANDHI KRISHNAVENI, W/O. KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D. N0.48-195/A, KUCHIPUDI HOMES, SRIRAMACHANDRA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 6. GOLLAPALLI KRISHNA PRASAD, S/O. SIVA RAMA PRASAD AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.48-195/A, KUCHIPUDI HOMES 6 SRIRAMACHANDRA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the provisional Notice No. /1086/GVMC/UC/2024 date 17-09-2024 passed by the 3rd respondent and confirmation orders Notice No /Z2/WS-68/WARD- 05/ACP-11/UC/2024 date 21-10-2024 passed by the 4th respondent and serving both the notices on 26-10-2024 is illegal, arbitrary, malacious and one without jurisdiction and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and to consequently setaside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish structures of the petitioner in pursuance of confirmation orders Notice No. /Z2/WS-68/WARD-05/ACP- II/UC/2024 date 21-10-2024 passed by the 4th respondent pending disposal of Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PARAVADA MANOJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NOs: 31348, 21626 and 30404 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: 1. The petitioner in W.P.No.31348 of 2025 submitted that he has filed an application under the BPS by invoking the G.O.Ms.No.225. It is submitted that the respondent authorities are required to consider the same application strictly in terms of G.O.Ms.No.225. 2. The learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.5 and 6 submits that, apart from deviations, the petitioner has also encroached upon the respondent’s property. The said issue is the subject matter of adjudication before the competent civil court in O.S.No.1020 of 2017. Insofar as the grievance of the petitioner is concerned, the same would have to be addressed in pursuance of the issuance of G.O.Ms.No.225. 3. In view of the above submissions, it is left open to the 2nd respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.225. 4. The petitioner in W.P.No.21626 of 2025 has filed the writ petition alleging inaction on the part of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not proceeding further in pursuance of the confirmation orders passed by the respondent No.2 against the respondent No.5. 5. Considering the submissions made, it is left open for the respondent No.2 to consider the application of the 5th respondent for regularization in terms of G.O.Ms.No.225, in accordance with law. 8 6. The petitioner in W.P.No.30404 of 2025 has filed the writ petition challenging the provisional order dated 17.09.2025. However, subsequent to the said provisional order, the 2nd respondent issued a confirmation order, dated 10.11.2025. That apart, the petitioner has applied for regularization by invoking G.O.Ms.No.225. 7. In view of the same and the subsequent developments, it is left open for the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner’s application in accordance with law and in terms of G.O.Ms.No.225. The respondent No.2 shall not take any coercive steps pending consideration and disposal of the petitioner’s application seeking regularization under G.O.Ms.No.225. 8. Accordingly, with the above directions these writ petitions are disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:28.11.2025 NKA 9 547 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NOs: 31348, 21626 and 30404 of 2025 Date: 28.11.2025 NKA