Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54945 (AP)

VADDE VEERESH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/24122/2025 · 2025-09-10

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010451432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24122/2025 Between: Vadde Veeresh ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOMMA VIJAYA RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 2 W.P. No.24122 OF 2025 Date of order: 11.09.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.24122 OF 2025 ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4th respondent -Corporation has entrusted the work viz., Supply and Delivery of 1.5 HP x 25 stage submersible Pump Set and Cistern with mini water tank at Methar Masjid and opposite Ambhabhavani temple under GGMP funds under agreement No.221/2023-24, dt.20.01.2024, to the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner duly executed the works undertaken by him and thereafter submitted final bills to a sum of Rs.6,37,358/-. It is submitted that the final bills were duly endorsed by the competent authority and the progress of the work was recorded in the M-book. However, in spite of the completion of all procedural formalities, no payment was made to the petitioner. 3. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning. 4. During the course of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Corporation does not dispute the submissions made by the petitioner with respect to the completion of the work undertaken. 3 W.P. No.24122 OF 2025 Date of order: 11.09.2025 5. Considering the submissions, respondents 2 and 4 are hereby directed to verify and release the payments due payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 7. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N BV