APHC010679982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35027/2025 Between: SMT. LANKE VENKATESWARAMMA,, W/O. LATE DANIYELU AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. R/O. H. NO. 3-51/A, SRIKAKULAM VILLAGE, GHANTASALA MANDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AT MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, AT MACHILIPATNAM. KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, GHANTASALA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GHANTASALA POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. SRI KORAPATI RAMA RAO, S/O. SATYAM, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. NIMMAGADDA VILLAGE, GHANTASALA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. SRI KORAPATI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. PUSHKARAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. NIMMAGADDA VILLAGE, GHANTASALA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 9. SRI LANKE GOPALA KRISHNA, S/O. CHINA BULLAIAH, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. POTHARLANKA VILLAGE, GHANTASALA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BABUJI TENNETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the Respondent No.2 to 6 herein in not taking any action on the Representation of the petitioner dated 05.12.2025 and 08.12.2025 and followed by personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 14,19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India. Consequently, direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 6 herein to act upon the representation dt. 05.12.2025 and 08.12.2025 by following due process of law and to take action against the Respondent Nos. 7 to 9 accordance with law.” 2. Sri Babuji Tenneti, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, it is a case of interference of Police in the civil matter. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, on the representation of the Petitioner, Respondent No.6 made an enquiry and found that the matter is of civil nature. It is further submitted that the Police are not interfering the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.35027 of 2025 Dt.30.12.2025 Dinesh