111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4857-2025 DECIDED ON: 13.05.2025 ARZOO AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONER(s) VERSUS UT CHD. AND ORS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Bhupeshwar Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Tapan Masta, APP, UT Chandigarh. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226/227 for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the petitioners. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, learned Counsel for UT Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and submits that preliminary enquiry was conducted; the petitioners were not found at the given address and the mobile phone of both the petitioners were not responding despite numerous calls were made by police official. Anuradha 2025.05.13 23:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4857-2025 2 However, he assures the Court that necessary action will be taken on the representation dated 28.04.2025 (Annexure P-7) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a speaking order within a period of three days from today, after conducting enquiry. In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the instant petition any further. The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 13.05.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.05.13 23:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document