137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4663-2025 DECIDED ON: 07.05.2025 TANIA AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. G.S. Bhinder, Advocate and Mr. S.K. Choudhar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226/227 for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the petitioners. Learned State Counsel has produced a copy of speaking order dated 07.05.2025 passed by the authorities concerned and a perusal of the Anuradha 2025.05.08 05:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4663-2025 2 same shows that a copy of the order has already been handed over to petitioner No. 1. Today a copy of the order has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner. In light of the above, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous and does not warrant any interference at this stage. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 07.05.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.05.08 05:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document