APHC010046412018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2050/2018 Between: 1. M MURTHI PRASAD, 0CC GOVT. EMPLOYEE R/O.DOOR NO.26- 981-01, MITTAMUDI 3RD STREET RAMESHWARAM VILLAGE, PRODDATUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT AMARAVATHI, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, A.P. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT KURNOOL, A.P. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KADAPA, A.P. 5. THE CHAIRMAN, SRI MADDIMANU GURRAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE GURRAPPAGARIPALLI (V), PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. SRI G RAMANA REDDY, CHAIRMAN, SRI MADDIMANU GURRAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE GURRAPPAGARIPALLI (V), PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. SRI MADDIMANU GURRAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER GURRAPPAGARIPALLI (V), PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing proceedings vide Rc.No.V3/20026/80/2017-2, dt.09.01.2018 and consequential proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent vide Memo Rc.No.A2/305/2018/Eos.,Estt, dt.11.01.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of natural justice and contrary to the A.P. Charitable and 2 Hindu Institutions and Endowments Executive Officers (Conduct) Rules 1978, and set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T RAJINIKANTH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T VENUGOPAL 2. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing proceedings vide Rc.No.V3/20026/80/2017-2, dt.09.01.2018 and consequential proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent vide Memo Rc.No.A2/305/2018/Eos.,Estt, dt.11.01.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of natural justice and contrary to the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Institutions and Endowments Executive Officers (Conduct) Rules 1978, and set aside the same ....” 2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II would submit that suspension of the Petitioner was revoked and thereafter he got promotion and no further orders are necessary. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 2050 of 2018 08.07.2025 Mjl /*