APHC010436562021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 26457/2021 Between: 1. BETHINA RAVI KISHORE, S/O.VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION, R/O.MATAMGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,. HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DHARMAJIGUDEM POLICE STATION, DHARMAJIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. KATTA KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O. LATE RAMA KRISHNA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. MATAMGUDERN VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. ILLA NARESH, S/O. DURGA RAO, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O. VERRAMPALEM VILLAGE, R/O. KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 4th respondent at the instance of respondents 5 to 6 in repeatedly insisting the petitioner to appear before their authorities and insisting him to vacate and deliver his agricultural land of Ac. 0.55 cents in Survey No.112-V2 of Konijerla Revenue Village in Lingapalem Mandal of West Godavari District with all Easement Rights to respondents 5 and 6, as illegal, irregular, irrational, arbitrary, without any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, particularly 4th respondent not to 2 interfere in any manner with the petitioner's possession over the said land and his personal liberty and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, particularly 4th respondent not to insist the petitioner to appear before his authority nor interfere in any manner with his personal liberty and possession over his agricultural land of Ac.0.55 cents in Survey No.112 1/2 of Konijerla Revenue Village in Lingapalem Mandal of West Godavari District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner seeking the following relief: “... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 4th respondent at the instance of respondents 5 to 6 in repeatedly insisting the petitioner to appear before their authorities and insisting him to vacate and deliver his agricultural land of Ac. 0.55 cents in Survey No.112-V2 of Konijerla Revenue Village in Lingapalem Mandal of West Godavari District with all Easement Rights to respondents 5 and 6, as illegal, irregular, irrational, arbitrary, without any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, particularly 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner's possession over the said land and his personal liberty and pass ....” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that there are civil disputes between the Petitioner and respondents 5 and 6 with regard to easementary rights over the subject property and in that regard, civil suit is pending before the competent Civil Court. Further, respondent Police never interfered in their disputes and never called the Petitioner or his family members to the Police Station to settled the issue and would finally submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. 4 Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submissions, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 28968 of 2021 14.10.2025 Mjl /*