APHC010222002019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9744/2019 Between: 1. KESANABOINA RAMA PRASAD, S/O.KRISHNAIAH, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.2-32-29/B, POSTAL COLONY, NANDULPET, TENALI TOWN, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI TOWN POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. NARESH KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN, OCC- INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI TOWN POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings regarding A-13 in Crime No.207/2019 dated 25.06.2019 of Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District is abuse of process of law, miscarriage of justice and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set-aside the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the 5th respondent by changing from the Investigation and prosecute him under penal law for gross misuse of power and punish him legally for the cause of torturing and harassing the petitioner's family members and staff, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings with regard to A-13 in Crime No.207/2019 of Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District, including the arrest of the petitioner herein and not to harass and torture the family members of the petitioner, pending disposal of writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B DEVADAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.9744 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner on the previous adjournment also. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 24.11.2025 Pmk 4 09 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:9744 OF 2019 Date: 24.11.2025 Pmk