Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54922 (KAR)

THE MANAGING COMMITTEE FOR THE WAQF v. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

WP/24411/2022 · 2025-10-13

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40231 WP No. 24411 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.24411 OF 2022 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN: THE MANAGING COMMITTEE FOR THE WAQF INSTITUTIONS OF NADEMOVINAPURA HAZARATH ISMAIL SHAH KHADRI DARGAH AND ALLIED WAQF INSTITUTIONS NADEMOVINAPURA KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572130 (REPRESENTED BY ITS PRISIDENT MOHAMMED UMMAR). …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAHAMATHULLA KOTHWAL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF NO.6 DARUL AUQAF CUNNIGHAM ROAD VASANTH NAGAR BENGALURU - 560051. 2. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER 2ND FLOOR BMTC BUILDING K H ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560027. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40231 WP No. 24411 of 2022 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTICT, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA TUMKUR - 572101. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMKUR SUB DIVISION TUMKUR - 572101. 5. THE TAHSILDAR KUNIGAL TALUK KUNIGAL TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DECLARE THE LAND IN SY.NOS.49, 140, 104, 107 AND 100-1A OF THE N M PURA VILLAGE, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT AS WAQF PROPERTIES BELONG TO THE PETITIONER INSTITUTION; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40231 WP No. 24411 of 2022 ORAL ORDER This petition is listed for 5th time for non- compliance of the office objections. Despite having been granted sufficient time, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance indicates that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance with office objections. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10