1 2025:CGHC:55030 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5912 of 2025 Vishnu Yadav S/o Rampati Aged About 65 Years Caste - Ahir, R/o Village - Kamarima, Police Station - Sanna, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner. versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector Jashpur, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bagicha, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Tahsildar Sanna, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Vinod Yadav S/o Late Amarnath. 6 - Santosh Yadav S/o Late Amarnath. 7 - Krishna Yadav S/o Rampati. Respondent Nos.5 to 7 are R/o Village - Kamarima, Police Station - Sanna, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents. For Petitioner : Shri Jitendra Kumar Saxena, Advocate. For State/Res : Shri Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer. (Hon’ble Shri Justice P arth Prateem Sahu) Order on Board AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2025.11.13 17:05:35 +0530 2 12/11/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the records pertaining to the case from the respondent authorities. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 for correcting the existing computer map in respect of land bearing khasra no. 100/7 admeasuring area 0.809 hectare situated at Village Kamarima, P.H.No. 11, R.I.C.- Pandrapath, Tahsil-Sanna, District-Jashpur (C.G.) within stipulated time. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 4 to ensure demarcation of land bearing khasra no. 100/7 on the basis of corrected map, in accordance with law, within stipulated time and further be pleased to restrain the respondents no. 5 to 7 from interfering into the possession of petitioner over the subject land. 10.4 To kindly grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case including cost of litigation. 2. Upon putting a query to learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether any application has been moved for correction of the map before the concerned Revenue Authority, he submits that no such document has been provided by the party and it does not form part of this Writ Petition. 3. Counsel for the State/Respondent would submit that based on the application filed by the petitioner for demarcation of his land, the 3 concerned Revenue Officials, who visited the spot for demarcation, pointed out, there exists a discrepancy between the map (online) and physical map. The Revenue Officials, therefore, advised correction of the revenue map. However, no application is available on record of the Writ Petition to demonstrate that the petitioner has filed any such application in this regard. 4. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner is having an efficacious alternative remedy under the Chattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, by way of filing an application for correction of the revenue map, which is to be considered by the concerned authority in accordance with law, I am not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file an appropriate application before the concerned Revenue Authority seeking correction of the revenue map. If such an application is filed, the concerned Authority shall consider the application and take decision on the same expeditiously in accordance with law. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Avinash