Sri Pinnaka Venkata Subba Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/5219/2018 · 2025-12-08
Ninala Jayasurya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54908 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54908 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010119202018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 5219/2018 Between:
1. SRI PINNAKA VENKATA SUBBA RAO, S/O LATE SRI. P. SRIRAMULU
AGED MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O. RACHAPUDI VILLAGE,
UPPUGUDUR POST,KORISAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH - 523186. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, O/O. THE TAHASILDAR, KORISAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DESTIRCT ANDHRA PRADESH - 523186
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
NJS,J W.P No.5219 of 2018 2
The Court made the following Order:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that though he is owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.2.60 cents in Survey No.159 of Rachapudi Village in online website “Mee Bhoomi” maintained by the Government of Andhra Pradesh and in 1-B Register extent was mentioned as Ac. 2.50 cents instead of Ac. 2.60 cents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that by virtue of Registered Gift deed No.451 of 1979 dated 17.07.1979 for an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents and another Registered Gift deed No.821 of 1980 dated 30.07.1980 for an extent of Ac.1.60 cents i.e., total extent of Ac. 2.60 cents in Survey No.159, the petitioner acquired the absolute rights over the same. He submits that taking into consideration the relevant documents, the respondent No.3 issued Pattadar Passbook and Title Deeds in respect of the said extent of Ac. 2.60 cents (Ex.P5). 4. The learned counsel also refers to the Ex.P4, 1-A Register dated 19.03.1982 wherein in the relevant columns reflects the name of the petitioner and the extent possessed by him as Ac. 2.60 cents in Survey No.159 situate in Rachapudi Village. Referring to the relevant deeds executed in favor of the petitioner, he submits that surprisingly in the online website and other revenue records, 1-B register, etc., the extent of land possessed by the petitioner was shown as Ac. 2.50 cents instead of Ac.2.60 cents.
He submits that though the petitioner approached the respondent No.3 by making an online application on 05.01.2017 to rectify the relevant entries, no action was taken and therefore, the petitioner was constrained to file the present writ petition. Be that as it may. NJS,J W.P No.5219 of 2018 3
5. As the respondent No.3 is competent to examine the matter with reference to the grievance of the petitioner, the learned counsel submits that the petitioner submitted all the relevant documents in respect of the subject matter property including the latest certificate of Encumbrance. 6. In view of the same, this Court deems it not necessary to examine the matter further. However, the respondent No.3 shall do the needful on the basis of the material/documents submitted by the petitioner and rectify the entries in the revenue records pertaining to the subject matter land, as expeditiously as possible, at a rate within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:09.12.2025 Ksj