IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 10322 of 2025 1. Rasmita Maharana 2. Rekha Maharana @ Minati 3. Basanti Maharana 4. Hari Hara Maharana 5. Sanatan Maharana 6. Satyajit Maharana 7. Bapuji Maharana …. Petitioners Mr. K. Gaya, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S.N. Das, ASC Mr. S. Mishra, Adv.(Informant) CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 12.09.2025 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Informant. 2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.1322 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Soro, arising out of Khaira P.S. Case No.285 of 2025 for commission of offence punishable under Sections 115(2)/117(1)/ 296/351(2)/3(5) of BNS,2023. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that out of a trivial incident without any premeditation the occurrence has taken place. 4. Learned counsel for the State as well as Informant oppose the prayer for pre-arrest bail. 5. Learned counsel for the Informant submits that the injured has suffered brain injury and further treatment has been referred to SCB MCH. 6. Taking into account the nature of allegations, this Court is not inclined to entertain this application in respect of Petitioner Nos.4 to 7 (Hari Hara Maharana, Sanatan Maharana, Satyajit Maharana & Bapuji Maharana respectively). However, in the event the Petitioner Nos.4 to 7 (Hari Hara Maharana, Sanatan Maharana, Satyajit Maharana & Bapuji Maharana respectively) surrender before the learned Court in seisin in the aforesaid case and move an application for their release on bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit. 7. So far as Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 are concerned, taking into account that the said Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 are ladies, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 (Rasmita Maharana, Rekha Maharana @ Minati & Basanti Maharana respectively) shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper. 8. It is needless to state that the Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Ayesha