1 2025:CGHC:20793 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1372 of 2025 1 - Chatdas Manikpuri Alias Panka S/o Late Hukumdas Manikpuri Aged About 47 Years R/o Post Salkhan District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Janjgir Sub-Division, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ganesh Ram Burman, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Choubey, PL Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 06/05/2025 1. By the present petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent authority to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of Unskilled Labour pursuant to the circular dated 05.03.2008 from the date when the similarly situated persons have been regularized. 2. Case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner is presently working RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.05.07 17:10:45 +0530 2 on the post of Unskilled Labour in department of respondent as daily wager and has completed more than two and a half decade. The petitioner is having all the requisite qualifications for holding the said post. The petitioner had submitted his detailed representation to the respondent authorities for considering his case for regular appointment as he had already completed more than two and a half decade 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the action on the part of the respondent authorities is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory in nature and also violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 15 & 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is a daily wager since long. He would further submit that the State government has regularized the services of similarly situated daily wage employees on the basis of circular dated 05/03/2008, therefore, the petitioner is also entitle for regularization of his services on the post of Unskilled Lavour. In support of his contention, learned counsel has relied on the judgment passed by this Court in the matter of Manoj Kumar Nirmalkar v. State of Chhattisgarh1 4. Per Contra, learned counsel for the respondents/State would oppose the contention of the counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Narendra Kumar Tiwari and Others v. The State of Jharkhand and Others2 held in para 11 as under: 1 WPS No. 4293 of 2012 (decided on 10/02/2023 2 Civil Appeal Nos. 7423-7429 of 2018 (decided on 01/08/2018) 3 "11. Under the circumstances, we are of the view that the Regularization Rules must be given a pragmatic interpretation and the appellants, if they have completed 10 years of service on the date of promulgation of the Regularization Rules, ought to be given the benefit of the service rendered by them. If they have completed 10 years of service they should be regularized unless there is some valid objection to their regularization like misconduct etc." 7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the principles of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the petition is allowed. The respondent authorities are directed to inspect the records of others similarly situated employees when their services were regularized. If the case of the petitioner is also found to be similar to those daily wagers whose services were regularized, his services be also regularized from the same date. It is also directed that all this exercise be completed within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Ssd/-d/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Rahul