IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.1992 of 2025 and connected matters Decided on: 27th March, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 1992 of 2025 Chetna Kumari & Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 2. CWP No. 2000 of 2025 Rajneesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 3. CWP No. 2002 of 2025 Tulsi Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 4. CWP No. 2333 of 2025 Anju Kumari & Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 5. CWP No. 2345 of 2025 Yagya Pal ....Petitioner Versus - 2 - State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents 6. CWP No. 2346 of 2025 Roshan Lal ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 7. CWP No. 2347 of 2025 Ratti Bala ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 8. CWP No. 2351 of 2025 Rajni ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 9. CWP No. 2352 of 2025 Nawal Kishor ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 10. CWP No. 2357 of 2025 Sartaj Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ - 3 - 11. CWP No. 2358 of 2025 Rajesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta and Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocates General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to developments that have taken place post the filing of these writ petitions, more specifically the enactment, i.e. The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, these writ petitions in the present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law, inter alia, assailing the aforesaid enactment. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 4 - 2. Prayer is accepted. Granting such liberty, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge March 27, 2025 R.Atal