Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54881 (CHH)

AKHILESH SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12069/2025 · 2025-10-15

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:51595 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12050 of 2025 Govind Ram Suryawanshi S/o Late Nakchhed Suryavanshi Aged About 72 Years R/o Birkona, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Public Works, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Division No. 1, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 12069 of 2025 1. Akhilesh Sharma S/o Late Shri Jawahar Sharma Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 4, Narayanpur, Bemetara, District Bemetara (C.G.) 2. Chandrawati Sharma Wd/o Late Shri Daooa Prasad Sharma Aged About 67 Years R/o Village Ward No.8, Kanidabri, Post Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Executive Engineer Water Resources Department, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.10.16 17:44:46 +0530 2 3. The Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pension, Durg Division, District Durg (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mayank Kumar and Mr. Khusbhu Sahu, Advocates For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, and Mr. K.S. Saini, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 16/10/2025 1. The issue involved in these writ petitions has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022] 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra) 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Santosh