IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 2342 OF 2025 Between; Jakkula Ramanamma, W/o Gurraiah Aged about 64yrs, Occ Agriculture R/o H.No.3-8, Narasingapalli village Porumamilla mandal YSR Kadapa District ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh.- Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The District Collector, YSR Kadapa District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Badvel, YSR Kadapa District 4. The Tahsildar, Porumamilla mandal YSR Kadapa District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents particularly 4th respondent in interfering with the petitioner's land extent may more <y Ac.1.84cts in Sy.No.443/1 of Rangasamudram village, Porumamilla mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law arbitrary, illegal, highhanded and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India as lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with the petitioner s land extent Ac.1.84cts in Sy.No.443/1 of Rangasamudram village, Porumamilla mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(s) : SRI B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE (R1 TO R4) The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010046392025 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT honourable SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARUU NIMMAGADDA \A/RIT PFTITIQN NO: 2342/2025 IN [3329] THE Between: ...PETITIONER Jakkula Ramanamma AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:2342/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to 1. issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities, more particularly, 4^'^ respondent herein in interfering with the petitioner’s land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1.84 cents in Sy.No.443/1 situated at Rangasamudram Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without \ following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, without touching the merits of the case, requested this Court to issue a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s property without following due process of law. He further submits that this Court vide order dated 30.01.2025 directed all the parties concerned to maintain status quo and the same is still in force. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents would follow due process of law and requested to pass appropriate orders. 5. When the petitioner is in settled possession and enjoyment of the the petitioner cannot be dispossessed, without following due property process of law in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in “Rame Gowda (dead) by L.Rs. v. M.Varadappa Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs.'”. Therefore, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents directed not interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property of the petitioner, except by due process of law. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of both the counsel. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand are 6. closed. 1 2004(1) see 769 Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE eOPY// SEe OFFieER To, 1. The Principal Secretary State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The District Collector, YSR Kadapa District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Badvel, YSR Kadapa District 4. The Tahsildar, Porumamilla mandal YSR Kadapa District 5. OneCC to SRI. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. THREE CD COPIES TAC 's HIGH COURT DATED:03/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.2342 of 2025 ^ro.=AN0j^ I O'APR 2025 Section . DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS