Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54875 (PNJ)

VED PRAKASH AND ANOTHER v. UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

CWP/13045/2025 · 2025-05-07

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-13045-2025 (O&M) 135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ved Parkash and another U.T., of Chandigarh and CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Parminder Kanwar, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Kaushik, Advocate for the respondents SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of representations dated 07.10.2024 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners under the provisions of the New Punjab Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952. 2. At the outset, l petitioner would be satisfied, in case, 07.10.2024 (Annexure P considered and by the respondents till date. 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Ved Parkash and another versus U.T., of Chandigarh and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate for Mr. Parminder Kanwar, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Kaushik, Advocate for the respondents – U.T., Chandigarh. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to representations dated 07.10.2024 (Annexure P 5) of the petitioners under the provisions of the New Punjab Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner petitioner would be satisfied, in case, their 07.10.2024 (Annexure P-4) and dated 23.12.2024 (Annexure P and decided by respondent No.2, which by the respondents till date. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13045-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: May 07, 2025 ….Petitioners ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN dvocate for the petitioners. Mr. Parminder Kanwar, Advocate and U.T., Chandigarh. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to take action on the (Annexure P-4) and dated 23.12.2024 5) of the petitioners under the provisions of the New Punjab earned counsel for the petitioners submits that their pending representations dated 4) and dated 23.12.2024 (Annexure P-5) is which have not been adverted to 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 s s Writ take action on the 4) and dated 23.12.2024 5) of the petitioners under the provisions of the New Punjab submits that representations dated is to MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-13045-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned counsel for the respondents appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that grievance of the petitioners will be looked into by respondent No.2 and it shall take decision either way, on the pending representations dated 07.10.2024 (Annexure P-4) and dated 23.12.2024 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the pending representations dated 07.10.2024 (Annexure P-4) and dated 23.12.2024 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 07, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment