Chuman Sahni @ Chumman Sahani @ Chuman Sahani v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./44354/2025 · 2025-07-14
R P Mishra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54872 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54872 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44354 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2025 Thana- BANJARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Chuman Sahni @ Chumman Sahani @ Chuman Sahani S/O Lalbabu Sahni @ Bahram Sahani @ Baliram Sahani Resident of village- Majhariya, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Kumari, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 14-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Banjariya PS Case No. 45 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section/s 30(a) & 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 274 & 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 140 liters country made liquor was recovered from gallons at the bank of a river.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44354 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 2/3 the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case on the disclosure made by local chowkidar. The petitioner is in custody since 06-05-2025 and has got thirteen (13) criminal antecedent/s. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Banjariya PS Case No. 45 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44354 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 3/3 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
Raj Kishore/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T