Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54869 (AP)

G LILLY PUSHPA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/15610/2021 · 2025-10-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010269642021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15610/2021 Between: 1. G LILLY PUSHPA, GOLLAPALLI LILLY PUSHPA W/O.DR.V.RAJENDRA PRASAD AGED 32 YEARS, OCC.HOUSEWIFE R/O.H.NO.102, STREET NO.6 GURUNANAK COLONY, SODHI ROAD FARIDKOT, PANJAB ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR E.G.DISTRICT, KAKINADA, AP 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT, AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the 2 High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 in not providing monitory relief required to be paid as per Rule 12 (4) of the SC, ST (POA) Rules 1995 being the victim in FIR No.18/2019 on the file of the Station House Officer, Rajamahendravaram II Town Urban Police Station, East Godavari District, AP in spite of petitioner's representation dt.06-06-2021 as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to provide the monitory relief as per Rule 12 (4) of the SC, ST (POA) Rules forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to consider petitioner's representation dt.06-06- 2021 for payment of monitory relief as per rule 12 (4) of SC and ST (POA) Rules pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15610 of 2021 The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 & 3 in not providing monitory relief required to be paid as per Rule 12 (4) of the SC, ST (POA) Rules 1995 being the victim in FIR No.18/2019 on the file of the Station House Officer, Rajamahendravaram II Town Urban Police Station, East Godavari District, AP in spite of petitioner's representation dt.06-06-2021 as highly illegal, arbitrary & contrary to law” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the compensation to the petitioner has been sanctioned and the bill is also presented to the treasury and hence, the amount will directly be transferred to petitioner’s account. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission itself. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated: 07.10.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15610 of 2021 Date: 07.10.2025 PSA