Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54865 (AP)

SK Parvin v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/24830/2020 · 2025-10-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010372542020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24830/2020 Between: 1. SK PARVIN, W/O SYED MEER, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO. 22-13-79/1B, AMBEDKAR COLONY, AUTONAGAR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, ANDHRA PRADESH, KOLANUKONDA, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ALIPIRI POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SRI SUBBA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, OCC CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, O/O SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE, ANANATHAPURAM. 6. SRI PALLEM SAI PRASAD, AGED MAJOR, OCC CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WORKING AT BUKKARAYASAMUDRAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D S N V PRASAD BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. RAVULA NAGARJUNA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents particularly 2 3rd respondent to take action on the complaint dated 11-12-2020 given by the petitioner forthwith and to produce the car bearing No. AP-39-CU-6442 before the 4th respondent forthwith and be pleased.” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and also unofficial respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that this petition is filed against the Circular Inspector in individual capacity and he has engaged a counsel. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.10.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24830 of 2020 Dt.06.10.2025 Asr