APHC010478442024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No: 24579/2024 Between: 1. OTIKUNDA MANGAMMA, , W/O. LATE VENKATESWARLU REDDY AGED 67 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, PAGADAMVARIPALEM, RAMBHOTLAPALEM PANCHAYAT, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, REPALLE, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 2. PITTU SITHAMAHA LAKSMI,, W/O. VENKATA REDDY @ REDDEIAH AGED 48 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, PAGADAMVARIPALEM, RAMBHOTLAPALEM, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 3. KOKI VENKATESWARAMMA,, W/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, PAGADAMVARIPALEM, RAMBHOTLAPALEM PANCHAYAT, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. DOMA RAJYA LAKSMI @ RAJAMMA,, W/O. VENKATA REDDY AGED 36 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, PAGADAMVARIPALEM, RAMBHOTLAPALEM PANCHAYAT, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT BAPATLA. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, REPALLE DIVISION, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, REPALLE CIRCLE, CHERUKUPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHERUKUPALLI POLICE STATION, CHERUKUPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 6. PYNAM VENKATA KRISHNA VENI, W/O. VENKATA RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, PAGADAMVARIPALEM, RAMBHOTLAPALEM PANCHAYAT, 2 CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 7. D SIVA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O KONDU REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O PAGADAMVARIPALEM VILLAGE CHERUKUPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KISHORE KUMAR KATARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents particularly respondents 4 and 5 at the instance of respondents 6 and 7 in sending police constables to petitioners' residence and insisting them to appear before their authority and yield to the terms of respondents 6 and 7 by handing over a portion of petitioners' landed property, admeasuring Ac. 0.20 cents out of Ac. 0.85 cents in D.No. 545/1 of Pagadamvaripalem Village, Rambhotlapalem Panchayat, Cherukupalli Mandal, Bapatia District. This is being done despite the fact that the subject matter is pending adjudication in CRP No. 3278 of 2023, filed by petitioners against the 6th respondent before this Hon'ble Court., as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere in any manner with petitioners' personal life and liberty nor insist them to appear before them for yielding to the terms of the respondents 6 and 7.” 2. Sri Kishore Kumari Katari, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that it is a case of interference of the Police in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, this is a civil dispute between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondents and the Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 3 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.12.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24579 of 2024 Dt.20.12.2025 Dinesh