- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29111 WP No. 15424 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 15424 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SRI T G SWAMY SON OF LATE C.N.GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT AANE MUTT ROAD, AACHAR STREET, CHIKKAPETE, TUMAKURU-572 101. 2. SRI.KRISHNA.M.V, SON OF LATE VASUDEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT MARANAYAKANA PALYA, DEVARAYAPATNA POST, KASABA EAST HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 104. 3. SRI.DHANANJAYA.V, SON OF VENKATACHAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT AANE MATHA ROAD, AACHAR STREET, CHIKKAPETE, TUMAKURU-572 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. FAYAZ SAB B G.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29111 WP No. 15424 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, NEAR SREE SIDDAGANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, TUMAKURU-572 102. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, TUMAKURU-572 102. 4. SRI.T.A.NAGARAJU, SON OF H.T.ANJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT 2ND CROSS, WEST BADAVANE, GUBBI GATE, TUMAKURU-572 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.K.P. YASHODHA., AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE CASE; DIRECT THE R2 AND 3 TO TAKE SUITABLE STRIGENT ACTION AGAINST THE R4 FOR WILLFUL DIS-OBEYANCE OF COURT ORDER DATED 09.12.2024 PASSED BY THIS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29111 WP No. 15424 of 2025 COURT IN WP. NO. 32811/2024 (GM-CPC) WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXUER -H; DIRECT THE R2 AND 3 TO GIVE POLICE PROTECTION TO THESE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioners seek directions to the jurisdictional Police, [the second and the third respondents], to take action against the private respondent because this respondent is allegedly disobeying the interim orders granted by this Court in W.P.No.32811/2024 on 09.12.2024. Sri Fayaz Sab B.G, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that this Court in W.P.No.32811/2024 has directed the fourth respondent to maintain status quo while also - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29111 WP No. 15424 of 2025 stipulating that the petitioners shall not put up any construction or change the nature of the property or alienate the same and the fourth respondent has not heeded to this order. Ms. K.P. Yashoda, the learned Additional Government Advocate, is heard on behalf of the Police Officers and the State. It would suffice for this Court to observe that if the petitioners have a cause, they must approach the very Court which has granted the status quo order and not present another petition which would only lead to multiplicity of proceedings. Hence, the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate application in W.P. No.32811/2024. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE NV