Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54855 (AP)

ONGOLE SUJATHA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/10717/2025 · 2025-04-30

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA / WRIT PETITION NO: 10717 OF 2025 Between: Ongole Sujatha, w/o Lakshmi Narasimha Rambabu aged about 79 years, occ; Housewife, r/o Kothapet, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati 2. The Joint Collector Addl. District Magistrate, Prakasam District, Ongole. The Tahsildar, Ongole Mandal, Prakasam Distinct. Ongole Sesha Venkata Kishna Kumar, w/o Venkata Krishna Manikyala Rao, aged 75 years Ongole Venkata Subba Rao, s/o Venkata Krishna Manikyala Rao, aged 53 years Ongole Venkata Krishna Bala Tripura Lakshmi, d/o Venkata Krishna Manikyala Rao, aged 52 years Nos. 4 to 6 are r/o Srigii Tower, Ongole Prakasam District. 3. 4. 5. 6. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 herein in issuing the impugned order in R.P.No. D.Dis.D2/908/2024 dt. 18-03-2025 allowing the Revision filed by the unofficial respondents without conducing proper enquiry and perusing the material available on record, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unilateral and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in R.P.No. D.Dis. D2/.908/2024 dt. 18-3-2025, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s V BABY RANI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 to 6: SRI M RAVIKANTH REDDY ^ The Court made the following order: 0 APHC010209232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10717/2025 Between: Ongole Sujatha ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.V BABY RANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.M RAVIKANTH REDDY The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10717/2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court 1. to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission as sought for is accorded. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No 3. costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ASsfsTAN^ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to M/s V Baby Rani Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. M Revikanth Reddy Advocate [OPUC] / 3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.10717of2025 DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS