Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54853 (AP)

S ASHOK KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/35228/2025 · 2025-12-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010684722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35228/2025 Between: 1. S ASHOK KUMAR, S/O. SANTHOSH KUMAR AGED 35 YEAR, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O. FLAT NO. 1107, 11TH FLOOR, B BLOCK ORANGE ESTELLA APARTMENTS, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMACHANDRAPURAM STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. REDDY RAMESH, S/O. VEERA RAGHAVULU, AGED. 42 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINES, R/O. H.NO. 3-50, NARASAPURAPUPETA, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ALLURI RAGHU RAMA AURAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35228/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ or Direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No. 3 interfering into money matters (civil disputes) and harassing the petitioner and his family members by calling them to police station at the behest of the respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Principals of natural justice and violation of Art- 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.…” 2. Heard Sri Alluri Raghu Rama Aurava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the official respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are interfering in the money matters between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent by calling the petitioner and his family members to the police station at the behest of the unofficial respondent No.4. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint made by the respondent No.4, a case in FIR.No.399 of 2025 dated 17.12.2025 of Ramachandrapuram P.S., Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District was registered against the petitioner and others for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 351(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS. He would further submit that the 3 petitioner was called to the police station regarding the said crime for the purpose of investigation. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which has been registered against the petitioner. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.12.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35228/2025 Dated.20.12.2025 UPS 175