Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54846 (AP)

Devaganugala Hari Prasad, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/34112/2025 · 2025-12-07

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010661642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 34112/2025 Between: 1. DEVAGANUGALA HARI PRASAD,, S/O. NAGABHUSHANAM, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC FAIR PRICE SHOP DEALER R/O. DNO.14-129, GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL ROAD, NEAR VISHNALAYAM, KANKIPADU VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTORCIVIL SUPPLIES, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VUYYURU DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICLAP ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus questioning the action of the Respondent Authorities in stopping supply of monthly quota of essential commodities to Petitioner'sO F.P.Shop (No.620006) in Kankipadu Village, Kankipadu 2 VS,J W.P.No.34112 of 2025 Mandal, KRISHNA District, AP without following the due process of law is highly illegal, arbitrary and exercise of power, violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art. 19 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to interfere with F.P.Shop (No.620006) in Kankipadu Village, Kankipadu Mandal, KRISHNA District, AP IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents release the supply of monthly quota of essential commodities F.P.Shop (No.620006) in Kankipadu Village, Kankipadu Mandal, KRISHNA District and pass appropriate orders pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. YASWANTH GADE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. YASWANTH GADE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.34112 of 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus questioning the action of the Respondent Authorities in stopping supply of monthly quota of essential commodities to Petitioner's F.P.Shop (No.620006) in Kankipadu Village, Kankipadu Mandal, KRISHNA District, AP without following the due process of law is highly illegal, arbitrary and exercise of power, violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art. 19 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to interfere with F.P.Shop (No.620006) in Kankipadu Village, Kankipadu Mandal, KRISHNA District, AP ….” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. 3. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies has produced a copy of proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Vuyyuru in Rc.CS/18/2025, dated 22.11.2025, whereby the petitioner’s authorization was placed under suspension. 4. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to challenge the proceedings dated 22.11.2025 issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Vuyyuru. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 08.12.2025 KGR