Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54841 (AP)

V.Rajagopala Chari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/2934/2017 · 2025-11-06

R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010468722017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2934/2017 Between: 1. V.RAJAGOPALA CHARI, S/O.PARTHASARATHY LYENGAR AGED ABOUT : 86 YEARS, OCC : ADVOCATE, 3/1, ARANDALPET, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.(REVENUE), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, TULLUR MANDAL. GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. SMT M DEVAKI, D/O LATE VINJAMURIVARADARAJU LYENGAR R/O.FLAT NO.102-8-3-678/60, PARK VIEW, PRAGATHI NAGAR, YOUSUFGUDA. HYDERABAD - 500 045 6. SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, VYKUNTAPURAM VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER C.O. DT. 13-3-17 IN WPMP 10327 OF 17 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 RRR, J W.P.No.2934 of 2017 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order of direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to order in ROR Case D.DIS.NO. 605/2016-A dated. 16-01-2017 passed by the ri respondent as without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary and quash the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 1230 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated: 30.01.2017 passed in WP No.2934/2017 IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 3453 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of order in ROR Case D.DIS.NO. 605/2016-A dated. 605/2016-A dated. 16-01-2017 passed by the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 3 OF 2017(WPMP 10327 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent No.6 i.e., "Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Vykuntapuram village, Amaravathi Mandal, Guntur District, Rep: by its Executive Officer' as party respondent no.6 in WP.No.2934/2017 as well as WPMP's and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. PARAVASTU KRISHNA 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE 3 RRR, J W.P.No.2934 of 2017 The Court made the following order: There has been no appearance for the petitioner on 14.08.2025 and on 31.10.2025. 2. There is no appearance for the petitioner today also, even when the matter was posted under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. As the petitioner does not appear to be interested in prosecuting this Writ Petition, it is accordingly, dismissed for default. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J 07.11.2025 MJA 4 RRR, J W.P.No.2934 of 2017 266 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2934/2017 07.11.2025 MJA