1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.812 of 2025 Date of Decision : 24.01.2025 Veena Kumari …… Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ……Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Vacation Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Rinkle Khood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. D.S. Kaith, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Bipin Chander Negi, Vacation Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the parties submit that on account of subsequent developments, present petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, so also, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Bipin Chander Negi) January 24, 2025 (KS) Vacation Judge 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?