Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54825 (AP)

PEDADA CHINNAMMADU v. THThe State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/394/2023 · 2025-11-03

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010006992023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 394/2023 Between: 1. PEDADA CHINNAMMADU, W/O POLAIAH, AGE. 56 YRS, R/O D.NO.3-71, MAIN STREET, VENKATARAYUNIGUDEM, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI, AMADALAVALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL ENGINEERING OFFICER, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, PONDURU, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE GRAM PANCHAYAT, V.R. GUDEM, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS 2 SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the high handed and illegal action of the respondents in demolishing house bearing Assessment No.393 of V.R.Gudem Gram Panchayat, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District, for the purpose of construction of CC road and Drains and in proceeding further to construct the road and drains by paying bills for such construction without issuing any prior notice and without following any known procedure established by law and without there being any authority or sanction of law as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents not to demolish or interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the said property in any manner including construction of CC road and drains in front of the said house and not to pay bills for such high handed and illegal construction and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish nor interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the house bearing Assessment No.393 of J.R.Gudem Gram Panchayat, Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District, in any manner including construction of CC road and drains in front of the said house and not to pay bills for such high handed and illegal construction, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass such 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for MPP ZPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) The Court made the following ORDER: Sri K. Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and that it has become infrucutous. Hence, nothing further remains for adjudication. Recording the said submissions, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 04.11.2025 ANS 4 263 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 394/2023 Date: 04.11.2025 ANS